Jul 28, 2010
giles

Limitations of Brand Communications in Social Media

While we continue to see companies dancing around their level of engagement and commitment to marketing through Social Media channels, some interesting limitations are apparent with these channels. Limitations in communication that are not easily overcome;

Textual Channels: Twitter, blogs, wall postings…anywhere where text is the primary method of communication. The issue here is “context” as it can be hard to identify what the person is “feeling” or how angry they are. Aside from perhaps a profile picture, it’s not easy to define an image of someone either. As we know, 60% of human communication is non-verbal. One might then say it is hard to truly engage in a medium with limitations to emotional expression. Emoticons are clever, but they only go so far. Flame wars erupt easily in textual channels.

Video Channels: With a service like Chatroulette this is a litter better for communication. One can see body gestures, facial expressions and denote tone of voice. The limitations here are what can be added to the conversation, such as other visuals, since you are often more dependent on location and form of camera. When it’s combining text and video response to posted videos in a sharing service like YouTube there is often delay in engagement and the chance of missed communication that can have any desired effect.

Audio Channels: Like a phone or Skype or similar IP Phone. With video enabled it helps, but similar restrictions to video channels apply. In audio communications we get tone of voice as an aid to completing the communication objective. But still, gestures and facial expression is limited.

So what does this mean in corporate attempts to engage with customer service or marketing through social media channels? Not understanding these limitations can negatively impact the outcome of the desired objective.

As with Nestle’s Facebook experience, the entire issue erupted over statements made by a Nestle marketing employee on the Facebook page for Nestle. It was purely textual. It was also a permanent linear string that all could see. This means the original context or framing of the issue rapidly spins out of hand. Nestle could have added some video response or offered a Web chat with video. This may have helped add elements that would’ve reduced the overheating of the issue. May have.

Each social media channel has its challenges. Understanding the limitations and the risks are key to success. They also add another level of education and knowledge development for a business, which adds cost to the management of these channels and reduces profits.

Do you see any other limitations?

(Author: G. Crouch)

3 Comments

  • [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Giles Crouch, Kimberly J. Wilson. Kimberly J. Wilson said: Limitations of Brand Communications in Social Media – http://ht.ly/2i23a [...]

  • This is certainly a unique point I haven’t come across on any social media blog! I appreciate your thoughtful presentation, but there are other things referring this subjects which are highly and constantly talking about. They are the protocols and policies for the usage of social media which tells your limitations.

  • Social media cannot replace reality. Having a meeting face to face is completely different from video conferencing and so forth. In my opinon you have to use different medias for different kind of communication.

    Unfortunately I do believe many companies are trying to avoid the expense and time of having meetings face to face. A mistake I’m certain will have a negative impact on their revenues and profit.

Leave a comment

RSSMediaBadger on Twitter

Social Media Research

Where is your online audience? What are they saying about you? This is where we come in. There's more social networks than just Facebook, there are hundreds of blog platforms and microblogs like Twitter. Real-time social media monitoring solutions don't provide the deep insights or reveal historical trends and issues. We do. When you really want to know what's happening in social media, we'll find it.

 

July 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031