<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Media Badger, Social Media Research &#38; Consultants &#187; blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediabadger.com/tag/blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediabadger.com</link>
	<description>Social Media Research, Analysis and Reputation Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:51:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Listen Up! And Listen Good Before You Engage</title>
		<link>http://www.mediabadger.com/2008/12/listen-up-and-listen-good-before-you-engage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediabadger.com/2008/12/listen-up-and-listen-good-before-you-engage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>giles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Listening]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabadger.com/?p=155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How often in sales training do the experts tell sales people &#8220;listen to what your prospect is saying. Repeat back what you heard to confirm you understood the question.&#8221; It is a fundamental principle in good selling &#8211; understand the prospect to be able to provide the solution. This practice applies well to Social Media [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mediabadger.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/picture-2.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-156" title="picture-2" src="http://www.mediabadger.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/picture-2.png" alt="" width="217" height="254" /></a>How often in sales training do the experts tell sales people &#8220;listen to what your prospect is saying. Repeat back what you heard to confirm you understood the question.&#8221; It is a fundamental principle in good selling &#8211; understand the prospect to be able to provide the solution. This practice applies well to Social Media engagement for business.</p>
<p>An excellent blog post from Washington DC communications firm <a href="http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2008/12/17/blog-last/#comment-73555" target="_blank">Livingston</a> talks about this. We have the step of &#8220;listening&#8221; as our very first element in working with clients. The difference in Social Media is that you don&#8217;t begin by vocally asking your &#8220;prospect&#8221;, in this case your market, what they want/need. You listen to them talking in various Social Media channels.</p>
<p>We work with clients to frame the questions for which they need answers. Then we do a lot of listening using our own set of proprietary tools. There are many On-Demand services that can do this listening from <a href="http://www.radian6.com" target="_blank">radian6</a> through to <a href="http://www.buzzmetrics.com" target="_blank">Buzzmetrics</a>. Regardless of what tool is used (they all have good and bad elements) the act of listening is a critical first step towards engagement with Social Media on a business level.</p>
<p>While a company blog may be useful, it&#8217;s not where to start, for that is &#8220;telling&#8221; as opposed to &#8220;listening&#8221;. Through listening first, a business can understand the shape, tone, style and nature of the conversations taking place, or not taking place, in the Social Mediasphere. The insights from this &#8220;listening&#8221; will help form a better strategy for how a business deals with Social Media. You will be able to better determine budgets, resource requirements, technologies to use and more.</p>
<p>If you want to close the sale, you need to listen and understand the prospect, provide the right solution&#8230;and then ask for the sale.</p>
<p>(Author: Giles Crouch, Managing Partner)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediabadger.com/2008/12/listen-up-and-listen-good-before-you-engage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Balanced Reporting and Blogs?</title>
		<link>http://www.mediabadger.com/2008/08/balanced-reporting-and-blogs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediabadger.com/2008/08/balanced-reporting-and-blogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>giles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabadger.com/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent survey by Rasmussen Reports shows there is some demand for &#8220;balanced reporting&#8221; in blogs. Is there really a potential impact? or is this just &#8220;noise&#8221; from a survey question? We contend that Blogs have really become the &#8220;opinion side&#8221; of the media, consumer dominated with business and government only just edging into active [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent <a href="http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/47_favor_government_mandated_political_balance_on_radio_tv" target="_blank">survey</a> by Rasmussen Reports shows there is some demand for &#8220;balanced reporting&#8221; in blogs. Is there really a potential impact? or is this just &#8220;noise&#8221; from a survey question? We contend that Blogs have really become the &#8220;opinion side&#8221; of the media, consumer dominated with business and government only just edging into active engagement in the blogosphere.</p>
<p>The survey says &#8220;Fifty-seven percent (57%) say the government should not require websites and blog sites that offer political commentary to present opposing viewpoints. But 31% believe the Internet sites should be forced to balance their commentary&#8221; and this is a &#8220;politically&#8221; focused question as well. The Democrats oppose government mandated balance on the Web by a 48% t 37% margin, while 61% of Republicans reject government involvement in Web content. The conversation it seems, truly is king. Seems unusual that Republicans would be more favourable of independence in content than Democrats.</p>
<p>In short, I doubt we will see any significant debate or impending laws on governing content on the Web anytime soon. Regulating would be a sheer nightmare, and consumer content on the Web continues to grow apace, despite <a href="http://www.gartner.com" target="_blank">Gartner Research</a> predicting a slow-down in blog activity. We suspect blogging and Social Media to rise in activity based on improved Smart Phone capabilities with the integration of Wi-Fi and 3G service, continued &#8220;cocooning&#8221; and more time spent at home in a slowing economy with high gas prices.</p>
<p>Do you think we&#8217;ll see a rise in Social Media activity in coming months? Will we ever reach a point where government might begin to regulate or attempt to regulate any form of Social Media? Would it even be possible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediabadger.com/2008/08/balanced-reporting-and-blogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
